December 11: bonjour decon

2012/12/11 § 5 Comments

ParcVilette

On this day in 1982 the first round of competition for the new Parc de la Villette was coming to a close.

The finalists were announced on December 11; on 25 March of the following year, Bernard Tschumi’s design would be announced as the winner of the huge international competition that attracted almost 500 entries from around the world.  Projected for a 125-acre site reclaimed from former slaughterhouses, the project was proposed as a new kind of park for the twenty-first century, challenging designers to think beyond all those fusty old greeneries with grass and trees and fountains and stuff that people had somehow been getting along with lo these many centuries.  Tschumi’s proposal challenged the paradigm by presenting a park that he claimed was based on “culture” instead of the old-fashioned idea of “nature.” Instead of the cohesive compositions designed with longtime strategies that brought natural features into harmonious design with manmade elements to enhance an outdoor experience–as seen in the Tuileries or Luxembourg for example (which is not, apparently, “culture”)–Tschumi proposed three distinct systems.  Conceived independently, the “points” (bright red cubic follies, assigned functions later), “lines” (paths and bridges) and “surfaces” (gravel, grass, paving stones, etc.) were superimposed with a resounding crash that echoed the true tone of the zeitgeist.  Indeed, Tschumi portrays the park not as a scattering of buildings across a landscape, but one “discontinuous . . . single structure” (that’s what the website says).

Villette was the first great public Deconstructivist project.  The architecture community lost its collective junk over this thing, and although it is visited by lots of people every year, somehow even more millions get it wrong and keep going back to those out-of-date gardens with the alles, parterres, terraces, box hedges, centralised fountain displays and pretty sculptures.  Little do they know they are supposed to, like Tschumi, “oppose the landscape notion of Olmstead [sic].”  Yet, then again, maybe they know something that the great Swiss-French thinker-architect missed in Olmsted’s work (along with learning how to spell that great American gardener’s name correctly).  (Yes, we are picky that way.)

Image: the park (from this source)

Advertisements

Tagged: , , , ,

§ 5 Responses to December 11: bonjour decon

  • the playing field of visionaries: how often do visions hit the wall of aesthetic language barriers? how seldom does anyone budge from their secure position behind that wall?

    • Clio says:

      My dear Mr. Lawson,
      When the wall is protected and fortified by virtually every official mouthpiece of The Profession as well as the majority of opinion in Academia, why bother?
      Your obt. servt., Clio

  • Sam says:

    When can we bid it adieu?

  • Susan Barsy says:

    I love it when Clio takes umbrage.
    But seriously–your photos let you down because the new park spaces don’t look so bad. They still look a damn sight better than much of what passes for a park in Chicago. The other parks you hold up as models probably looked pretty pathetic when they were new. . . Save those red monstrosities, I’m unpersuaded.
    SB

  • Clio says:

    Ms. Barsy will enjoy learning (if it is news to her) that early press for Netsch’s design for the UIC campus explained that its inclusion of movable chairs on the concrete plazas would make it just like the Bois de Boulogne.

Clio loves comments! Please leave a reply.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

What’s this?

You are currently reading December 11: bonjour decon at Clio’s Calendar: Daily Musings on Architectural History.

meta

%d bloggers like this: