April 06: patriot grrls at Mt. Vernon

2012/04/06 § 2 Comments

On this day in 1853 the Ladies Association purchased Mt. Vernon.

Hard to imagine that the shrine-ization of presidential homes has not always been an American no-brainer, but the practice of honoring of US Presidents by preserving their homes as historic monuments didn’t happen until well into the country’s history.  Even a place as hallowed as the home of George Washington was ignored and nearly fell to ruin a half-century after the first President’s death.  By the mid-nineteenth century, government on both the state and federal level had developed an unfortunate squeamishness, if not outright hostility, toward supporting art and architecture that represented the country’s power and promise.  (To which the Founders, responsible for loads of urban, architectural and artistic manifestations from the grand city plan of Washington DC and its buildings to the great paintings by Trumbull that hang in the Capitol rotunda would say, are you kidding me?)

Enter Louise Dalton Bird Cunningham, South Carolina fancylady, who wrote about Mt. Vernon to her daughter (we paraphrase here, but you can still imagine the Ken Burnsesque voiceover): Those morons who run the government can’t get their act together to save this house; it’s time for the grrls to ‘man up’ and get it done.  Her daughter, Ann Pamela Cunningham, got busy, founding the Mt. Vernon Ladies Association to do, at a nationwide grassroots level, what the federal and state government wouldn’t or couldn’t.  Although her gauzy portrait does not suggest that she would be the motivating force behind early American grrl power, Cunningham rallied and motivated women across the US and raised $200,000 to save the building.  (Converting values across the centuries is always risky, but even a lowball estimate values that sum as something like $5.8 million today).

The preservation of the house has been important both in historic and architectural terms, but there’s more to this story.  The Ladies Association was a national one, and it is heartening to see this kind of significant cooperation of North and South here at mid-century, when you think about what else was going on in the country.  The Ladies Association can also be seen as the start of historic preservation movement in the US–neither a small nor unimportant thing.  Americans had already shown themselves willing and able to knock down all kinds of “outmoded” buildings in the name of progress.  In particular, the huge economic development of the 1830s led to the destruction of significant buildings and landscapes from the early national and Colonial periods; it really wasn’t until the twentieth century that the movement began in earnest, following in the dainty but firm footsteps of the Ladies Association.  Also, the story of Mt. Vernon is the first of innumerable similar stories of sites of cultural, architectural and/or historical significance saved by grassroots efforts from mindless development, not to mention fervent, patriotic energies focused on something that matters to Americans, even when the people voted into places of control seem to miss the point.  Occupy Mt. Vernon?

Image: Mt. Vernon, ca. 1860 (from this source)

Advertisements

Tagged: , , ,

§ 2 Responses to April 06: patriot grrls at Mt. Vernon

  • Susan Barsy says:

    Clio: you are all-knowing, so perhaps you can tell us whether Martha had ANY role in the aesthetic decisions that went into making Mount Vernon. I’m always struck by how MV is treated solely as George’s creation, as a reflection of his creativity and tastes, and I’ve always wondered if it’s true. Or the whole truth.
    SB

  • Clio says:

    Susan, Martha certainly did have influence in the design of the house, from at least the standpoint that it was first renovated/enlarged to accommodate her arrival as the new wife. She was a pretty tasty widow who had been living in a really good house, so it’s unthinkable that she wouldn’t have imposed some of her taste on her new husband. Only a dumb broad would do that, and she was no dumb broad. There is also some indication, or evidence, in her specific choices in china and furniture, as well as doing alllll the needlepoint for alllll of the dining room chairs. But, as in most good marriages, it’s hard to define just where one person ends and the other begins. But you are right in general, it wasn’t just Ol’ Toothless directing the designers while she sat silently in the corner.

Clio loves comments! Please leave a reply.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

What’s this?

You are currently reading April 06: patriot grrls at Mt. Vernon at Clio’s Calendar: Daily Musings on Architectural History.

meta

%d bloggers like this: